Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hodges v. Epps, 00-1400 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1400 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 29, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1400 EDWARD F. HODGES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD EPPS, JR.; SAMUEL R. BROWN, II, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-788) Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1400 EDWARD F. HODGES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD EPPS, JR.; SAMUEL R. BROWN, II, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-788) Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward F. Hodges, Appellant Pro Se. David Gant Shuford, Laura Graham Fox, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; William Reilly Marchant, THORSEN, MARCHANT & SCHER, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Edward F. Hodges appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint and post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hodges v. Epps, No. CA-99-788 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2 & Mar. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer