Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lee v. NC Dept of Trans, 00-1603 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1603 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 27, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1603 LISA ANN LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Division Four-Resident Engineer's Office; DON DUPREE, in his individual and official capac- ity; THOMAS M. MCKEEL, a/k/a Mike McKeel, in his official and individual capacity; KATHY UNDERWOOD HAYES, in her official and individ- ual capacity; JOHNNY B. VICK, in his official and individual capacity; CLAUDIA R. SPEED, in her official a
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1603 LISA ANN LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Division Four-Resident Engineer's Office; DON DUPREE, in his individual and official capac- ity; THOMAS M. MCKEEL, a/k/a Mike McKeel, in his official and individual capacity; KATHY UNDERWOOD HAYES, in her official and individ- ual capacity; JOHNNY B. VICK, in his official and individual capacity; CLAUDIA R. SPEED, in her official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-967-5-BR(2)) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lisa Ann Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Tina Ann Krasner, Assistant Attor- ney General, Sarah Ann Lannom, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lisa Ann Lee appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on her employment discrim- ination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lee v. North Carolina Dep’t of Transportation, No. CA-98-967-5-BR(2) (E.D.N.C. Apr. 4, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer