Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McIntosh v. Lone Star Steakhouse, 00-1692 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1692 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1692 PATRICIA C. MCINTOSH; WILLIAM S. MCINTOSH, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus LONE STAR STEAKHOUSE & SALOON, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-118-1-MU) Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 17, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirm
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1692 PATRICIA C. MCINTOSH; WILLIAM S. MCINTOSH, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus LONE STAR STEAKHOUSE & SALOON, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-118-1-MU) Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 17, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph B. Bergen, JOSEPH B. BERGEN AND FREDERICK S. BERGEN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW, Savannah, Georgia, for Appellants. Jacqueline D. Grant, ROBERTS & STEVENS, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Patricia McIntosh and her husband appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in Appellee’s favor in this neg- ligence action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McIntosh v. Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., No. CA-98-118-1-MU (W.D.N.C. May 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer