Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Coley v. NC Industrial Comm, 00-1996 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1996 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1996 JOHNNY F. COLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION; THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA; E. O. MAR- SIGLI, MD; JOHN BADLEY, Dr.; JOHN STEEL, Dr.; RUSSELL KIRBY; TAFT & TAFT; EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE; DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malc
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1996 JOHNNY F. COLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION; THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA; E. O. MAR- SIGLI, MD; JOHN BADLEY, Dr.; JOHN STEEL, Dr.; RUSSELL KIRBY; TAFT & TAFT; EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE; DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-00-90-4-H-3) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny F. Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Johnny F. Coley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coley v. North Carolina Indus. Comm’n, No. CA-00-90-4-H-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27, 2000). In addition, we deny all pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer