Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Alston v. Corcoran, 00-6094 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-6094 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 18, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6094 JOHN C. ALSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 99-431-DKC) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per cur
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6094 JOHN C. ALSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 99-431-DKC) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John C. Alston, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attor- ney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: John C. Alston seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Alston v. Corcoran, No. CA-99-431-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer