Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Leslie, 00-6478 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-6478 Visitors: 50
Filed: Dec. 13, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6478 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NEVILLE SYLVESTER LESLIE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-152, CA-99-1029-AM) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 13, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublish
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6478 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NEVILLE SYLVESTER LESLIE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-152, CA-99-1029-AM) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 13, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pleasant Sanford Brodnax, III, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alex- andria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Neville Sylvester Leslie seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Leslie, Nos. CR-98-152; CA-99-1029-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer