Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. White, 00-7125 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7125 Visitors: 52
Filed: Dec. 21, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7125 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DEBORAH L. WHITE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-194, CA-99-898-5) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7125 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DEBORAH L. WHITE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-194, CA-99-898-5) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deborah L. White, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Deborah L. White seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. White, Nos. CR-97-194; CA-99-898-5 (S.D.W. Va. July 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer