Filed: Mar. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1800 SALEM JABRI, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A29-005-735) Submitted: February 8, 2000 Decided: March 14, 2000 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE CENTER, INC., Silver Spring, Marylan
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1800 SALEM JABRI, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A29-005-735) Submitted: February 8, 2000 Decided: March 14, 2000 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE CENTER, INC., Silver Spring, Maryland..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1800
SALEM JABRI,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A29-005-735)
Submitted: February 8, 2000 Decided: March 14, 2000
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bokwe G. Mofor, IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE CENTER, INC., Silver Spring,
Maryland, for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attor-
ney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Ellen Sue
Shapiro, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litiga-
tion, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Salem Jabri seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“Board”) decision and order affirming the immigration judge’s
denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. On
petition for review, Jabri argues that the Board erred in its
determination that Jabri failed to demonstrate seven years of con-
tinuous physical presence in the United States. Our review of the
record discloses that the Board properly affirmed the immigration
judge’s decision and that this appeal is without merit. According-
ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Salem
Jabri, No. A29-005-735 (B.I.A. May 18, 1999); see also Appiah v.
INS,
202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2