Filed: May 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2570 DEWEY STANLEY KEENE; DELORES KEENE, Adminis- tratrix of the Estate of Matthew Todd Keene, deceased, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-99-129-1) Submitted: April 14, 2000 Decided: May 12, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2570 DEWEY STANLEY KEENE; DELORES KEENE, Adminis- tratrix of the Estate of Matthew Todd Keene, deceased, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-99-129-1) Submitted: April 14, 2000 Decided: May 12, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Ci..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2570 DEWEY STANLEY KEENE; DELORES KEENE, Adminis- tratrix of the Estate of Matthew Todd Keene, deceased, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-99-129-1) Submitted: April 14, 2000 Decided: May 12, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl E. McAfee, MCAFEE LAW FIRM, P.C., Norton, Virginia, for Appel- lants. Howard C. McElroy, BUNDY, MCELROY & HODGES, Abingdon, Vir- ginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Dewey Stanley Keene and Delores Keene (“the Keenes”) appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for The Travelers Indemnity of Illinois in the Keenes’ declaratory judgment action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Keene v. Travelers Indem- nity of Illinois, No. CA-99-129-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2