Filed: Mar. 21, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2581 In Re: FORREST EJAY SURRETT, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-22-1) Submitted: March 10, 2000 Decided: March 21, 2000 Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Forrest Ejay Surrett, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Forrest Ejay S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2581 In Re: FORREST EJAY SURRETT, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-22-1) Submitted: March 10, 2000 Decided: March 21, 2000 Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Forrest Ejay Surrett, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Forrest Ejay Su..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2581
In Re: FORREST EJAY SURRETT,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-22-1)
Submitted: March 10, 2000 Decided: March 21, 2000
Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Forrest Ejay Surrett, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Forrest Ejay Surrett has filed a petition for a writ of man-
damus in this court to compel the district court to expedite its
consideration of his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) action.
The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used
in extraordinary circumstances. See In re Beard,
811 F.2d 818, 826
(4th Cir. 1987). A petitioner must show that he has a clear right
to the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear duty to
perform the act requested by the petitioner, and that there is no
adequate remedy available. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,
860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).
Surrett has failed to make the requisite showing for such ex-
traordinary relief. Our review of the district court docket sheet
discloses that there has been significant action in the case in the
past six months, and therefore there has been no undue delay in the
consideration of Surrett’s § 1983 action. We therefore deny his
petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2