Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brown v. Spartanburg Cnty Det, 99-7222 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7222 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 28, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7222 JOHN P. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SPARTANBURG COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY; LARRY W. POWERS, Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-3151-3-6-BC) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7222 JOHN P. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SPARTANBURG COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY; LARRY W. POWERS, Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-3151-3-6-BC) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John P. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr., HOL- COMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: John P. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility, No. CA-98-3151-3-6- BC (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer