Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Blackwell, 99-7343 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7343 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7343 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY LEE BLACKWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-94-115, CA-98-978-1) Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 17, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodn
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7343 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY LEE BLACKWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-94-115, CA-98-978-1) Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 17, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Lee Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Rodney Lee Blackwell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999)* and reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion accepting the recommen- dation of the magistrate judge, and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See United States v. Blackwell, Nos. CR-94-115; CA- 98-978-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 23 & Sept. 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * Although Blackwell styled his motion as one seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994), the magistrate judge and the district court properly construed it as arising under § 2255. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer