UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7364 DAVID BRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. MOORE, Sgt, CO III, 7 am to 3 pm shift; D. BAKER, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; E. ITNYER, Officer, CO II 7 am to 3 pm shift; OFFICER POWELL, Co I, 7 am to 3 pm shift; J. ROSEBERRY, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; E. CLARK, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; J. B. AMBROSE, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; SERGEANT MARTIN, CO III 7 am to 3 pm shift; AL DAVIS, Hearing Officer's Disciplin- ary Hearing; JOSEPH P. SACHETT, Warden; T. MUNSON, CO S, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 98-3814-CCB) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Bright, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, As- sistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: David Bright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bright v. Moore, No. CA-98-3814-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 25, 1998 & Sept. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2