Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Orrandy Goodwyn, 99-7414 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7414 Visitors: 29
Filed: Mar. 03, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7414 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ORRANDY GOODWYN, a/k/a Randy, a/k/a White Boy, a/k/a Trash, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-96-41, CA-98-460-3) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7414 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ORRANDY GOODWYN, a/k/a Randy, a/k/a White Boy, a/k/a Trash, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-96-41, CA-98-460-3) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orrandy Goodwyn, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Orrandy Goodwyn seeks to appeal the district court’s order de- nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See United States v. Goodwyn, Nos. CR-96-41; CA-98- 460-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer