UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7504 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDWARD LAWRENCE GHOLSON, a/k/a Edward Lawrence Randall, a/k/a Carlton Peerman, Defendant - Appellant. No. 99-7505 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY ELLIS GHOLSON, a/k/a Sylvester Bradley, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-93-53-4, CA-98-109-4, CR-97-72-4, CA-98-110-4) Submitted: April 28, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Lawrence Gholson, Appellant Pro Se. Damon A. King, OFFICE OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE, Fort Monroe, Virginia; Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Appellant Gholson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) challenging his 1998 guilty plea and sentence and his 1998 supervised release revocation. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealabil- ity and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gholson, Nos. CR-93-53-4; CA-98-109-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 1999); United States v. Gholson, Nos. CR-97-72-4; CA-98-110-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3