Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. McBride, 99-7691 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7691 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 02, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7691 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DANNY GENE MCBRIDE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-263-G, CR-90-264-G, CR-90-265-G, CA- 97-575-6) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7691 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DANNY GENE MCBRIDE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-263-G, CR-90-264-G, CR-90-265-G, CA- 97-575-6) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Gene McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Danny Gene McBride seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McBride, Nos. CR-90-263-G; CR-90-264- G; CR-90-265-G; CA-97-575-6 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer