Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Claude v. Northwest Airlines, 00-1287 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1287 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1287 FRANTZ CLAUDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-99-1269-A) Submitted: January 23, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lathal Ponder, Wa
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1287 FRANTZ CLAUDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-99-1269-A) Submitted: January 23, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lathal Ponder, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John J. Gallagher, Kenneth M. Willner, Dianne C. Coombs, PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM Frantz Claude appeals from the order of the district court dismissing his complaint against Northwest Airlines, Inc. (“North- west”). We have reviewed the briefs and materials submitted in the appendices and find that each count contained in Claude’s complaint was properly subject to summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the order dismissing Claude’s complaint against Northwest on the reasoning of the district court. Claude v. Northwest Airlines, No. CA-98-107-7 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer