Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ditton v. Bank of America, 00-1428 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1428 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 16, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1428 In Re: MICHAEL H. DITTON, Debtor. MICHAEL H. DITTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION; CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, INCORPORATED; BANK OF AMERICA NT&SA; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; CRESTAR BANK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-99-1745-A, BK-98-10301, AP-
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1428 In Re: MICHAEL H. DITTON, Debtor. MICHAEL H. DITTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION; CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, INCORPORATED; BANK OF AMERICA NT&SA; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; CRESTAR BANK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-99-1745-A, BK-98-10301, AP-99-1002) Submitted: February 6, 2001 Decided: February 16, 2001 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Henry Ditton, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Francis Lynch, III, James A. Murphy, Jr., Harris Lee Kay, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Cindra Myers Dowd, GLASSER & GLASSER, Norfolk, Virginia; C. Thomas Brown, SILVER & BROWN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael H. Ditton appeals from the district court’s order af- firming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in this adversary proceeding. We have reviewed the record and the opinions below and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ditton v. Bank of America, Nos. CA-99-1745-A; BK-98- 10301 (E.D. Va. Feb. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer