Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gray v. Virginia Healthcare, 00-2273 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-2273 Visitors: 28
Filed: Feb. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2273 ELIZABETH K. GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA HEALTHCARE WASTE MANAGEMENT, INCORPO- RATED, d/b/a Sci-med Waste Systems; RICHARD HENK; RICHARD SHIVELY; SIDNEY ALLEN CONNER, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-499-7) Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001 Be
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2273 ELIZABETH K. GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA HEALTHCARE WASTE MANAGEMENT, INCORPO- RATED, d/b/a Sci-med Waste Systems; RICHARD HENK; RICHARD SHIVELY; SIDNEY ALLEN CONNER, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-499-7) Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth K. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffery Scott Sexton, GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MOORE, Roanoke, Virginia; Joseph Dudley McCluskey, Laura Graham Fox, Susan Childers North, Charles Garrison Meyer, III, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Elizabeth K. Gray appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the Defendants on her employment discrimination complaint. We have re- viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the jury’s verdict. Gray v. Virginia Healthcare Waste Mgmt., No. CA-99-499-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 1999). Gray’s motion for ap- pointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer