Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

May v. Pokoik Racing, 00-2553 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-2553 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 15, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2553 KIRSTY ANNE MAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus POKOIK RACING STABLES, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Lion Farm, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-00-170-3-19) Submitted: April 13, 2001 Decided: May 15, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Ca
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2553 KIRSTY ANNE MAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus POKOIK RACING STABLES, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Lion Farm, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-00-170-3-19) Submitted: April 13, 2001 Decided: May 15, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Carl Detwiler, CALLISON, TIGHE & ROBINSON, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina. Mark S. Barrow, William R. Calhoun, Jr., SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kirsty Anne May appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendant and denying her motion for recon- sideration in her personal injury action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See May v. Pokoik Racing Stables, Inc., No. CA-00-170-3-19 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2000; entered Oct. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer