Filed: Apr. 20, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6466 JAMES STUCKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PAUL KIRBY, Warden, Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-98-122-1) Submitted: September 26, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2001 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished pe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6466 JAMES STUCKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PAUL KIRBY, Warden, Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-98-122-1) Submitted: September 26, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2001 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6466 JAMES STUCKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PAUL KIRBY, Warden, Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-98-122-1) Submitted: September 26, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2001 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Stuckey, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charles- ton, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Stuckey appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stuckey v. Kirby, No. CA-98-122-1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2