Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Bell, 00-7014 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7014 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 28, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL ANTHONY BELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-91-189) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Bethea Burnside, FEDERAL P
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL ANTHONY BELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-91-189) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Bethea Burnside, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Bell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for resentencing under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bell, No. CR-91-189 (D.S.C. July 14, 2000). Bell’s motions for appointment of counsel on appeal and to file a formal brief are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer