Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Turner v. Osborne, 00-7550 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7550 Visitors: 43
Filed: May 22, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7550 ANTHONY JOSEPH TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; DOCTOR ANGLIKER; DOCTOR RAYNAUD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1106-7) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 22, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. A
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7550 ANTHONY JOSEPH TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; DOCTOR ANGLIKER; DOCTOR RAYNAUD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1106-7) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 22, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Joseph Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & DILLON, Roanoke, Virginia; Larry Benson Kirksey, Bristol, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Anthony Joseph Turner appeals the district court’s order denying his requests to restructure the court-arranged disbursement schedule of his settlement award. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Osborne, No. CA-95-1106-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2000). We deny Turner’s motions for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer