Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Filsaime, 00-7567 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7567 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jan. 19, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7567 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AMARILDO FILSAIME, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Dis- trict Judge. (CR-96-212, CA-99-1101) Submitted: January 11, 2001 Decided: January 19, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Amar
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7567 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AMARILDO FILSAIME, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Dis- trict Judge. (CR-96-212, CA-99-1101) Submitted: January 11, 2001 Decided: January 19, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Amarildo Filsaime, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Amarildo Filsaime seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Filsaime, Nos. CR-96-212; CA-99-1101 (M.D.N.C. filed Aug. 17, 1999; entered Aug. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer