Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Burton v. Rushton, 00-7591 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7591 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7591 JOHNNY BURTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE RUSHTON, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-99-2438-3-22-BC) Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 23, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judge
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7591 JOHNNY BURTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE RUSHTON, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-99-2438-3-22-BC) Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 23, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Johnny Burton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Burton v. Rushton, No. CA-99-2438-3-22-BC (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer