Filed: Mar. 16, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7684 WILLIAM A. FISHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COURT & LEGAL RECORDS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-00-617-3) Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Fisher, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7684 WILLIAM A. FISHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COURT & LEGAL RECORDS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-00-617-3) Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Fisher, Appellant ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7684
WILLIAM A. FISHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COURT & LEGAL RECORDS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-617-3)
Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William A. Fisher appeals a district court order dismissing
without prejudice under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(g) (West Supp. 2000) his
civil rights complaint. We decline to rule on whether the three
appeals cited by the district court count as strikes for purposes
of § 1915(g) and dismiss the appeal on alternate grounds. See
Cochran v. Morris,
73 F.3d 1310, 1315 (4th Cir. 1996). Because we
find that Fisher’s civil rights complaint fails to state a claim,
we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. See Clemente v. Allen,
120 F.3d
703, 705 (7th Cir. 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2