Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robinson v. Wood, 00-7722 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7722 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 03, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7722 RESTONEY ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TERRY WOOD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-99-445) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 3, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Restoney Ro
More
                               UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                               No. 00-7722



RESTONEY ROBINSON,

                                              Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus


TERRY WOOD,

                                              Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-99-445)


Submitted:    April 27, 2001                  Decided:   May 3, 2001


Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Restoney Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for reconsideration of an order allowing him to file

papers in a case that already was closed.   Our review of the record

discloses no abuse of discretion.     National Org. for Women v.

Operation Rescue, 
47 F.3d 667
, 669 (4th Cir. 1995) (denial of Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accord-

ingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.




                                                           AFFIRMED




                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer