Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hildreth v. Dean, 00-7740 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7740 Visitors: 28
Filed: Mar. 19, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7740 LOUIS STEVENSON HILDRETH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR DEAN; CHARLENE CHAY; NURSE JOHNSON; NURSE STEPHSON; NURSE MANNING; NURSE LACOMBE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-612-5-BR) Submitted: March 6, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7740 LOUIS STEVENSON HILDRETH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR DEAN; CHARLENE CHAY; NURSE JOHNSON; NURSE STEPHSON; NURSE MANNING; NURSE LACOMBE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-612-5-BR) Submitted: March 6, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis Stevenson Hildreth, Appellant Pro Se. Renee Billings Crawford, YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, Raleigh, North Carolina; John P. Scherer, FILE, PAYNE, SCHERER & BROWN, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Louis Stevenson Hildreth appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hildreth v. Dean, No. CA-99-612-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer