Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barker v. Spangler, 00-7790 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7790 Visitors: 116
Filed: May 17, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7790 DON LOUIS BARKER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus ROBERT SPANGLER, Acting Warden; ATTORNEY GEN- ERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00- 2625-MJG) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 17, 2001 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7790 DON LOUIS BARKER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus ROBERT SPANGLER, Acting Warden; ATTORNEY GEN- ERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00- 2625-MJG) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 17, 2001 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Don Louis Barker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN- ERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Don Louis Barker, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Barker v. Spangler, No. CA- 00-2625-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer