Filed: Aug. 07, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1010 NORMAN L. NICHOLS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAROLINE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-3352-H) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 7, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman L. Nichols, Jr.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1010 NORMAN L. NICHOLS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAROLINE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-3352-H) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 7, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman L. Nichols, Jr.,..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1010 NORMAN L. NICHOLS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAROLINE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-3352-H) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 7, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman L. Nichols, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steven David Frenkil, Stephanie Renae DeKraai, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Norman L. Nichols, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant on Nichols’ claim of racial discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nichols v. Caroline County Bd. of Educ., No. CA-99-3352-H (D. Md. Nov. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
