Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Allnutt v. Handler, 01-1038 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1038 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 03, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1038 FRED W. ALLNUTT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GORDON ROBERT HANDLER, Group Manager, Internal Revenue Service; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Region Four; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees, and ALBERT D. ADAMS, JR., Disclosure Officer, In- ternal Revenue Service; MARC ARONIN, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service; PHIL BRAND, District Director; RICHARD L. CHAUNCEY, R
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1038 FRED W. ALLNUTT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GORDON ROBERT HANDLER, Group Manager, Internal Revenue Service; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Region Four; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees, and ALBERT D. ADAMS, JR., Disclosure Officer, In- ternal Revenue Service; MARC ARONIN, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service; PHIL BRAND, District Director; RICHARD L. CHAUNCEY, Reve- nue Agent, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-901-Y, CA-98-1722-Y) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 3, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Thomas Sheehan, Melissa Anemojanis Holton, Jonathan Samuel Cohen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Tamera Lynn Fine, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his actions filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 1996 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Allnutt v. Handler, Nos. CA-98-901-Y; CA-98-1722-Y (D. Md. May 24, 2000 and Oct. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer