Filed: Aug. 02, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1263 LOUIS A. RODRIGUEZ, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RIDGEWOOD SAVINGS BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-2077-A) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1263 LOUIS A. RODRIGUEZ, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RIDGEWOOD SAVINGS BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-2077-A) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1263
LOUIS A. RODRIGUEZ, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RIDGEWOOD SAVINGS BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-00-2077-A)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis A. Rodriguez, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Grady Craven Frank, Jr.,
Rebecca Everett Kuehn, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Louis A. Rodriguez, a former resident of Queens, New York, now
residing in Alexandria, Virginia, appeals the district court’s
order granting Defendant Ridgewood Savings Bank’s motion to dismiss
his complaint. After a review of the record, we find that the
district court properly dismissed this action for lack of personal
jurisdiction over Defendant. See Helicopteros Nacionales de Colom-
bia S.A. v. Hall,
466 U.S. 408, 415-16 (1984).
We accordingly affirm the district court’s order. We deny
Rodriguez’s motion to amend his complaint and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2