Filed: Jun. 08, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1494 ARTHUR JAY HIRSCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEAN W. WITHERS; FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK OF TIMBERVILLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-00-98-5) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1494 ARTHUR JAY HIRSCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEAN W. WITHERS; FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK OF TIMBERVILLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-00-98-5) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1494 ARTHUR JAY HIRSCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEAN W. WITHERS; FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK OF TIMBERVILLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-00-98-5) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Jay Hirsch, Appellant Pro Se. David Alvin Penrod, HOOVER, PENROD, DAVENPORT & CRIST, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Arthur Jay Hirsch appeals the district court’s order dismiss- ing his civil complaint. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hirsch v. Withers, No. CA-00-98-5 (W.D. Va. March 9, 2001). We deny Hirsch’s motion for declaratory judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
