Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Elliott v. FDIC, 01-1771 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1771 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1771 ROGER ELLIOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-00-1553-A) Submitted: October 3, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1771 ROGER ELLIOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-00-1553-A) Submitted: October 3, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Donald McGillicuddy, FED- ERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Roger Elliott appeals the district court’s order granting the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment as to Elliott’s petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision and on his claim of employment discrimination based on age, race, sex, and reprisal in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record, the briefs, and the district court’s opinion rendered from the bench and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Elliott v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., No. CA-00-1553-A (E.D. Va. filed May 11, 2001; entered May 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer