Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richardson v. FBI, 01-2167 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-2167 Visitors: 34
Filed: Dec. 05, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2167 WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and UNITED STATES CONGRESS; UNITED STATES SENATE, Plaintiffs, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; THE STATE OF MARYLAND; BRADY GUN LAW, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-01-610-2) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2167 WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and UNITED STATES CONGRESS; UNITED STATES SENATE, Plaintiffs, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; THE STATE OF MARYLAND; BRADY GUN LAW, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-01-610-2) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint in which he challenges the constitutionality of the Brady gun law. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. FBI, No. CA-01-610- 2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer