Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bridges v. Tucker, 01-6004 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6004
Filed: Mar. 16, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6004 CURTIS J. BRIDGES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Chairman, Virginia Pa- role Board; GENE M. JOHNSON, Deputy Director, Division of Operations, VDOC; JACK LEE, War- den, Keen Mountain Correctional Center; JOHN R. ALDERMAN, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board; JAMES JENKINS, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board; RON ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6004 CURTIS J. BRIDGES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Chairman, Virginia Pa- role Board; GENE M. JOHNSON, Deputy Director, Division of Operations, VDOC; JACK LEE, War- den, Keen Mountain Correctional Center; JOHN R. ALDERMAN, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board; JAMES JENKINS, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board; RON ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-771-7) Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis J. Bridges, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Curtis J. Bridges appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bridges v. Tucker, No. CA-00-771-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer