Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Johnson v. Larsen, 01-6049 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6049 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 27, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6049 JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. D. LARSEN, Warden; RONALD J. ANGELONE; W. P. ROGERS, Regional Director; C. WALLACE; J. TOWNSEND; J. BERRY, Sergeant; S. HARRIS; R. WHITEHEAD, Captain; D. NEWCOMB, Sergeant; R. JENNINGS, Sergeant; R. MARTIN, Lieutenant; D. GRAHAM; L. FORD, Correctional Officer; B. BOISE, Correctional Officer; W. HARVEY, Sergeant; D. INGRAM; S. HAILEY; G. COOK; W. GRIFFIN, Sergeant; G
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6049 JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. D. LARSEN, Warden; RONALD J. ANGELONE; W. P. ROGERS, Regional Director; C. WALLACE; J. TOWNSEND; J. BERRY, Sergeant; S. HARRIS; R. WHITEHEAD, Captain; D. NEWCOMB, Sergeant; R. JENNINGS, Sergeant; R. MARTIN, Lieutenant; D. GRAHAM; L. FORD, Correctional Officer; B. BOISE, Correctional Officer; W. HARVEY, Sergeant; D. INGRAM; S. HAILEY; G. COOK; W. GRIFFIN, Sergeant; G. GRAHAM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-99-582) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: December 27, 2001 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Joseph Johnson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint, denying his motion for reconsideration, and denying various preliminary motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. According- ly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Larsen, No. CA-99-582 (E.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2000; Apr. 25, 2000; July 7, 2000; Aug. 4, 2000; Nov. 29, 2000; Aug. 15, 2001). We deny Johnson’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer