Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carr v. Poteat, 01-6116 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6116 Visitors: 53
Filed: Oct. 01, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6116 DONALD CARR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ADRIENNE POTEAT, Warden; MICHAEL GAINES, United States Parole Commission Chairman, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-2071-AM) Submitted: May 18, 2001 Decided: October 1, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6116 DONALD CARR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ADRIENNE POTEAT, Warden; MICHAEL GAINES, United States Parole Commission Chairman, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-2071-AM) Submitted: May 18, 2001 Decided: October 1, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Donald Carr appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carr v. Poteat, No. CA-00-2071-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2000). We grant Carr’s motion to amend his informal brief to correct a typo- graphical error, and the corrected pages have been filed. We deny his motion for a preliminary injunction and his request for a cer- tificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer