Filed: May 11, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6169 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABIODUN S. BASHORUN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR- 96-177, CA-00-2563-CCB) Submitted: April 17, 2001 Decided: May 11, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abiodun S. Bashorun, Appe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6169 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABIODUN S. BASHORUN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR- 96-177, CA-00-2563-CCB) Submitted: April 17, 2001 Decided: May 11, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abiodun S. Bashorun, Appel..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6169 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABIODUN S. BASHORUN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR- 96-177, CA-00-2563-CCB) Submitted: April 17, 2001 Decided: May 11, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abiodun S. Bashorun, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Sales, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Abiodun S. Bashorun seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bashorun, Nos. CR-96-177; CA- 00-2563-CCB (D. Md. filed Jan. 11, 2001; entered Jan. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2