Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Morris, 01-6303 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6303 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 07, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6303 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAMONT LEROY MORRIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CR-99-10, CA-00-196-1) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 7, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished pe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6303 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAMONT LEROY MORRIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CR-99-10, CA-00-196-1) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 7, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lamont Leroy Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lamont Leroy Morris seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Morris, Nos. CR-99-10; CA-00-196-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer