Filed: May 29, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6379 FERNANZA L. BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHELLE B. MITCHELL; JAMES WOMACK; CHARLES WILKINS; DIANNE MINNETI; K. S. JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-00-1959-AM) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 29, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6379 FERNANZA L. BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHELLE B. MITCHELL; JAMES WOMACK; CHARLES WILKINS; DIANNE MINNETI; K. S. JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-00-1959-AM) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 29, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6379 FERNANZA L. BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHELLE B. MITCHELL; JAMES WOMACK; CHARLES WILKINS; DIANNE MINNETI; K. S. JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-00-1959-AM) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 29, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fernanza L. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Fernanza L. Brooks, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brooks v. Mitchell, No. CA-00-1959-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
