Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Morejon-Pacheco v. Federal Bureau Prsns, 01-6536 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6536 Visitors: 38
Filed: Aug. 29, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6536 JULIO MOREJON-PACHECO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution - Butner, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-230-5-BO) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6536 JULIO MOREJON-PACHECO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution - Butner, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-230-5-BO) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julio Morejon-Pacheco, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Julio Morejon-Pacheco appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Morejon-Pacheco v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-00-230-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We deny Morejon-Pacheco’s motion to transfer the appeal. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer