Filed: September 19, 2001 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6725 (CA-00-392-2-11AJ) Clarence Edward Alexander, Petitioner - Appellant, versus United States Department of Justice, et al., Respondents - Appellees. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed September 13, 2001, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 3 -- the district court informa- tion is corrected to read “Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-392-2-11AJ)”. On page 2, line 6 of text -- “S.D.W. Va.” is corrected to read “D.S.C.” For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk  UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6725 CLARENCE EDWARD ALEXANDER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; BUREAU OF PRISONS; MICKEY E. RAY, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-392-2-11AJ) Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 13, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Edward Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Clarence Edward Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Alexander v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. CA-00-392-2-11AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3