Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Watson, 01-7072 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-7072 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAUREN ANTHONY WATSON, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-01-2115-8-20) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. La
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAUREN ANTHONY WATSON, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-01-2115-8-20) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. E. Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-01-2115-8-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2001; filed June 14, 2001, entered June 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer