Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Martin, 01-7333 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-7333 Visitors: 36
Filed: Dec. 10, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7333 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SCOTT ANTHONY MARTIN, a/k/a Patsy Martin, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-00-82) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sc
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7333 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SCOTT ANTHONY MARTIN, a/k/a Patsy Martin, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-00-82) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott Anthony Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Scott Anthony Martin appeals from the district court’s order denying his request for preparation of transcripts at government expense in order to prepare a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martin, No. CR- 00-82 (E.D. Va. filed July 13, 2001; entered July 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer