Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Shakoor, 01-7532 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-7532 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 10, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7532 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABDULLAH RASOOL SHAKOOR, a/k/a Lee McDonald, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-64-BO, CA-00-144-7-BO) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7532 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABDULLAH RASOOL SHAKOOR, a/k/a Lee McDonald, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-64-BO, CA-00-144-7-BO) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abdullah Rasool Shakoor, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Abdullah Rasool Shakoor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shakoor, Nos. CR-97-64-BO; CA-00-144-7-BO (E.D.N.C. filed June 26, 2001; entered June 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer