Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bledsoe v. Commissioner of SSA, 01-1747 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1747 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 15, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1747 KATHY M. BLEDSOE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-43-2) Submitted: December 17, 2001 Decided: January 15, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1747 KATHY M. BLEDSOE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-43-2) Submitted: December 17, 2001 Decided: January 15, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Susan Kipp McLaughlin, MCLAUGHLIN & CURRY, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellant. James A. Winn, Regional Chief Counsel, Region III, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Chief Counsel, Nicholas Cerulli, Assis- tant Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Patrick M. Flatley, United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kathy M. Bledsoe appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner in her action seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny Bledsoe’s application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion, and the decision of the adminis- trative law judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bledsoe v. Com- missioner of Social Security, No. CA-00-43-2 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer