Filed: Feb. 06, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2065 In Re: MUZIO ROBERTO; In Re: MARY K. ROBERTO, Debtors. MUZIO ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-78-AW) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2065 In Re: MUZIO ROBERTO; In Re: MARY K. ROBERTO, Debtors. MUZIO ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-78-AW) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affir..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2065 In Re: MUZIO ROBERTO; In Re: MARY K. ROBERTO, Debtors. MUZIO ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-78-AW) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Muzio Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Muzio Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to reconsider a prior order affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of their Chapter 13 petition. Our review of the record and the district court’s opin- ion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberto v. United States Trustee, No. CA-01-78-AW (D. Md. filed July 23, 2001, entered July 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2