Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Levy v. State Bd of Election, 01-2250 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-2250 Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 04, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2250 CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; JAMES S. GILMORE, III, Governor of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-01-1035-A) Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2250 CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; JAMES S. GILMORE, III, Governor of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-01-1035-A) Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles William Levy, Appellant Pro Se. James Walter Hopper, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles William Levy appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Levy v. State Bd. of Elections, No. CA-01-1035-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 14, 2001 & entered Sept. 19, 2001; filed Oct. 1, 2001 & entered Oct. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer