Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Allmond v. Royal Ins Co America, 01-2477 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-2477 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 21, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2477 DARRYL ALLMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; ANGELA BARTLEY, Claim Representative; BENJAMIN J. TRICHILLO; YOUNG J. YOU; ROGER GISOLFI; MICHELE HEDIN; HOME PLACE; LYNN DONAHUE; NICHOLAS PATRONAS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-01-1468) Submitted: March 14, 2
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2477 DARRYL ALLMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; ANGELA BARTLEY, Claim Representative; BENJAMIN J. TRICHILLO; YOUNG J. YOU; ROGER GISOLFI; MICHELE HEDIN; HOME PLACE; LYNN DONAHUE; NICHOLAS PATRONAS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-01-1468) Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lewis Rigsby, Charles F. Midkiff, MIDKIFF, MUNCIE & ROSS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Ronald Paul Herbert, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Cynthia Lee Santoni, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, McLean, Virginia; William Boyle Porter, Maura Jane Graham, BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, Fairfax, Virginia; Robert J. Lloyd, III, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia; Stephen Lewis Altman, Marc Andrew Brown, MONTEDONICO, HAMILTON & ALTMAN, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allmond v. Royal Ins. Co. of America, No. CA-01-1468 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 7, 2001; entered Dec. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer